RAG vs fine-tuning

Retrieval or fine-tuning? Usually both, on evidence.

Retrieval keeps answers current and cited. Fine-tuning teaches a small model your tasks, formats and vocabulary. We measure both on your questions before deciding.

In short

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) answers from your documents at question time, so answers stay current and cite their source. Fine-tuning further trains a model on your examples so it learns tasks, formats and vocabulary. Facts that change belong in retrieval; repeated narrow tasks and strict latency budgets favour a fine-tuned small model. Many systems use both.

Side by side

What each is good at.

Retrieval (RAG)Fine-tuned small model
Keeps facts currentYes, no retrainingNo, needs retraining
Cites sourcesYesNot by itself
Learns formats and tasksPartly, through promptsYes
Specialist vocabularyPartlyYes
Latency and hardwareDepends on the base modelLow: small models run fast
Respects permissionsYes, at retrieval timeOnly through what it was trained on

How we decide

Measured, not assumed.

  1. Build an evaluation set

    Questions and tasks from your own work, with expected answers.

  2. Measure retrieval alone

    Usually the baseline, and often enough.

  3. Try a fine-tuned small model

    Only where the task is narrow, repeated or latency-bound.

  4. Keep what wins

    The evaluation set stays with you to re-test any change.

FAQ

Questions, answered.

Does fine-tuning leak our data?

Not with DeepVox: fine-tuning runs on your infrastructure and the weights are yours. Keep personal data out of training sets unless there is a clear basis.

Is fine-tuning expensive?

For small open-weight models, much less than it used to be. We size it in discovery.